Discussion:
A tribute to Ronald Reagan
(too old to reply)
Jasmine
2004-06-11 03:48:25 UTC
Permalink
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=5688

and: ....the Observer were devoted to "How the Gipper stole into
American hearts".

This was a tribute to Ronald Reagan, whose "sunny attitude" and "iconic
status" made him "a consummate communicator" whose "popularity knew no
bounds".

Yes, he had increased America's war spending as never before, but that was
"to fight the Communist peril".

Ad nausea. Reagan's true distinctions were as follows.

At the height of his "popularity", fewer Americans voted for him than for
any modern era president - 27 per cent of the electorate. No other post-1945
president, apart from George W Bush, presided over such a distortion in the
economic life of the United States. Billions were taken from ordinary
Americans and handed, in tax cuts, to the richest 5 per cent. The Reagan
regime helped create the Taliban and supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical
weapons. An anti-apartheid sanctions bill was passed in congress only after
Reagan tried to veto it. Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America, one of the world's poorest regions,
for which he ought to be remembered. The Observer writer Paul Harris did
make a passing reference to the Iran-Contra affair and the "public row" that
"claimed some notable scalps".

Reagan, however, "survived" - unlike tens of thousands of his victims. For
most of his two terms in the 1980s, Reagan secretly approved an onslaught on
El Salvador and Nicaragua. In El Salvador, the CIA funded, trained and
directed a jack-booted, black-helmeted National Guard which, together with
death squads it controlled, murdered thousands, especially moderate
reformers: those like Jose Viera, president of the El Salvador Land Reform
Institute, and Archbishop Oscar Romera, who was shot dead as he held up the
chalice at Mass, having made the mistake of preaching that the enforced
poverty of his flock was not God's will, and they should resist the
American-sponsored terror regime.

On rubbish tips outside San Salvador,
morning after morning, I saw bodies killed by Reagan's clients, including
pregnant women. In its attacks on Nicaragua, Reagan's "contra" forces
specialised in slitting the throats of midwives and children as they slept.
In charge of this terrorism was John Negroponte, US ambassador to Honduras,
who, reported the Baltimore Sun, created and directed a military unit that
"used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations. Prisoners often were
kept naked and, when no longer useful, killed and buried in unmarked
graves." George W Bush has just appointed Negroponte as the first American
"ambassador" to "liberated" Iraq. You might have thought these matters were
worthy of mention in the Observer - that, under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism. Having omitted all this, Harris quipped of the
Gipper: "You had to admire his style". This is not the Telegraph, or a
Murdoch paper. In Britain's oldest liberal newspaper, the very idea of a
dissenting voice is becoming exotic."
Colonel Polyps
2004-06-11 09:29:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jasmine
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=5688
Piss on his grave.

Biggest sack of shit president he ever had, next to bushit.

Nancy looks like a fucking raisin.

Death to NAZI USA
C. Pangus
2004-06-11 10:24:05 UTC
Permalink
Thank you for a breadth of reality!
Post by Jasmine
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=5688
and: ....the Observer were devoted to "How the Gipper stole into
American hearts".
This was a tribute to Ronald Reagan, whose "sunny attitude" and "iconic
status" made him "a consummate communicator" whose "popularity knew no
bounds".
Yes, he had increased America's war spending as never before, but that was
"to fight the Communist peril".
Ad nausea. Reagan's true distinctions were as follows.
At the height of his "popularity", fewer Americans voted for him than for
any modern era president - 27 per cent of the electorate. No other post-1945
president, apart from George W Bush, presided over such a distortion in the
economic life of the United States. Billions were taken from ordinary
Americans and handed, in tax cuts, to the richest 5 per cent. The Reagan
regime helped create the Taliban and supplied Saddam Hussein with chemical
weapons. An anti-apartheid sanctions bill was passed in congress only after
Reagan tried to veto it. Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America, one of the world's poorest regions,
for which he ought to be remembered. The Observer writer Paul Harris did
make a passing reference to the Iran-Contra affair and the "public row" that
"claimed some notable scalps".
Reagan, however, "survived" - unlike tens of thousands of his victims. For
most of his two terms in the 1980s, Reagan secretly approved an onslaught on
El Salvador and Nicaragua. In El Salvador, the CIA funded, trained and
directed a jack-booted, black-helmeted National Guard which, together with
death squads it controlled, murdered thousands, especially moderate
reformers: those like Jose Viera, president of the El Salvador Land Reform
Institute, and Archbishop Oscar Romera, who was shot dead as he held up the
chalice at Mass, having made the mistake of preaching that the enforced
poverty of his flock was not God's will, and they should resist the
American-sponsored terror regime.
On rubbish tips outside San Salvador,
morning after morning, I saw bodies killed by Reagan's clients, including
pregnant women. In its attacks on Nicaragua, Reagan's "contra" forces
specialised in slitting the throats of midwives and children as they slept.
In charge of this terrorism was John Negroponte, US ambassador to Honduras,
who, reported the Baltimore Sun, created and directed a military unit that
"used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations. Prisoners often were
kept naked and, when no longer useful, killed and buried in unmarked
graves." George W Bush has just appointed Negroponte as the first American
"ambassador" to "liberated" Iraq. You might have thought these matters were
worthy of mention in the Observer - that, under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism. Having omitted all this, Harris quipped of the
Gipper: "You had to admire his style". This is not the Telegraph, or a
Murdoch paper. In Britain's oldest liberal newspaper, the very idea of a
dissenting voice is becoming exotic."
m***@merde.com
2004-06-11 10:45:08 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!

Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!

Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Dwain
2004-06-11 14:51:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
Jack Nichols
2004-06-11 19:39:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dwain
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
The debate is still hotter than ever:

http://two.guestbook.de/gb.cgi?gid=378540&prot=jcklzb
Jasmine
2004-06-11 21:47:45 UTC
Permalink
Yes...this was a good one: "During his years in office, Reagan was not
particularly popular. Gallup just published poll figures comparing him
during office with other presidents. His average ratings during his years in
office were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above Nixon, Ford,
Carter. This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he was ranked
just next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then
there has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and
historic figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect,
radically shifting the rankings. Not on the basis of facts: rather,
extremely effective marketing. The current performance is reminiscent of the
death of Hirohito and Soviet leaders. One of the more depraved moments of US
media. The lying is quite impressive, even by people who surely know
better."
Post by Jack Nichols
Post by Dwain
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
http://two.guestbook.de/gb.cgi?gid=378540&prot=jcklzb
VietEraA6Ordie
2004-06-12 01:59:29 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:47:45 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Yes...this was a good one: "During his years in office, Reagan was not
particularly popular. Gallup just published poll figures comparing him
during office with other presidents. His average ratings during his years in
office were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above Nixon, Ford,
Carter. This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he was ranked
just next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then
there has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and
historic figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect,
radically shifting the rankings. Not on the basis of facts: rather,
extremely effective marketing. The current performance is reminiscent of the
death of Hirohito and Soviet leaders. One of the more depraved moments of US
media. The lying is quite impressive, even by people who surely know
better."
What crap. When Reagan left office his poll numbers were higher than
any liberal POS you can think of.
Post by Jasmine
Post by Jack Nichols
Post by Dwain
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
http://two.guestbook.de/gb.cgi?gid=378540&prot=jcklzb
--

Well, sure, the government lies, and newspapers lie,
but in a democracy they aren't the same lies
<Alexis A. Gilliland>
Jasmine
2004-06-12 02:26:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:47:45 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Yes...this was a good one: "During his years in office, Reagan was not
particularly popular. Gallup just published poll figures comparing him
during office with other presidents. His average ratings during his years in
office were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above Nixon, Ford,
Carter. This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he was ranked
just next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then
there has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and
historic figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect,
radically shifting the rankings. Not on the basis of facts: rather,
extremely effective marketing. The current performance is reminiscent of the
death of Hirohito and Soviet leaders. One of the more depraved moments of US
media. The lying is quite impressive, even by people who surely know
better."
What crap. When Reagan left office his poll numbers were higher than
any liberal POS you can think of.
WRONG...you are living in a far right fantasy world. Check your facts. This
is a post from a reputable (award winning) UK journalist.
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
Post by Jack Nichols
Post by Dwain
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
http://two.guestbook.de/gb.cgi?gid=378540&prot=jcklzb
--
Well, sure, the government lies, and newspapers lie,
but in a democracy they aren't the same lies
<Alexis A. Gilliland>
RoyDMercer
2004-06-12 06:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:47:45 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Yes...this was a good one: "During his years in office, Reagan was not
particularly popular. Gallup just published poll figures comparing him
during office with other presidents. His average ratings during his years in
office were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above Nixon, Ford,
Carter. This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he was ranked
just next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then
there has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and
historic figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect,
radically shifting the rankings. Not on the basis of facts: rather,
extremely effective marketing. The current performance is reminiscent of the
death of Hirohito and Soviet leaders. One of the more depraved moments of US
media. The lying is quite impressive, even by people who surely know
better."
What crap. When Reagan left office his poll numbers were higher than
any liberal POS you can think of.
Actually in the last 40 years, Clinton and Kennedy have them all beat.

Average approval ratings of past presidents (averaged across entire term in
office):

Reagan - 53%
Clinton - 55%
Carter - 45%
Nixon - 34%
Ford - 47%
Johnson - 39%
Kennedy - 70%
Colonel Polyps
2004-06-12 11:00:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jasmine
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:47:45 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Yes...this was a good one: "During his years in office, Reagan was not
particularly popular. Gallup just published poll figures comparing him
during office with other presidents. His average ratings during his
years
Post by Jasmine
in
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
office were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above
Nixon,
Post by Jasmine
Ford,
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
Carter. This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he
was
Post by Jasmine
ranked
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
just next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then
there has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and
historic figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect,
radically shifting the rankings. Not on the basis of facts: rather,
extremely effective marketing. The current performance is
reminiscent of
Post by Jasmine
the
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
death of Hirohito and Soviet leaders. One of the more depraved
moments of
Post by Jasmine
US
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Post by Jasmine
media. The lying is quite impressive, even by people who surely know
better."
What crap. When Reagan left office his poll numbers were higher than
any liberal POS you can think of.
Actually in the last 40 years, Clinton and Kennedy have them all beat.
Average approval ratings of past presidents (averaged across entire term in
Reagan - 53%
Clinton - 55%
Carter - 45%
Nixon - 34%
Ford - 47%
Johnson - 39%
Kennedy - 70%
Elect me for president and I will be the 1st real Patriotic President. I
will open the borders and tear down the economy wall. No more poor
prejudice allowed.
A giant sucking sound will be heard from greedy corporate jets
immigrating to loyalist land, Israel, Italy, Bermuda, Australia,
England.

Death to the christian jew cop governemnt
mange@merde.com
2004-06-12 12:40:31 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:18:46 -0500, "RoyDMercer"
Post by RoyDMercer
Actually in the last 40 years, Clinton and Kennedy have them all beat.
Average approval ratings of past presidents (averaged across entire term in
Reagan - 53%
Clinton - 55%
Carter - 45%
Nixon - 34%
Ford - 47%
Johnson - 39%
Kennedy - 70%
It's amazing that some sophomoric people think being the leader of the
free world is a "popularity contest".

So much immaturity!
Jasmine
2004-06-12 22:42:11 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by RoyDMercer
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
any liberal POS you can think of.
Actually in the last 40 years, Clinton and Kennedy have them all beat.
Average approval ratings of past presidents (averaged across entire term in
Reagan - 53%
Clinton - 55%
Carter - 45%
Nixon - 34%
Ford - 47%
Johnson - 39%
Kennedy - 70%
IN REALITY:"...Gallup just published poll figures comparing him during
office with other presidents. His average ratings during his years in office
were below Kennedy, Johnson, Bush I, and Clinton; above Nixon, Ford, Carter.
This is averages during their terms in office. By 1992 he was ranked just
next to Nixon as the most unpopular living ex-president. Since then there
has been an immense PR campaign to convert him into a revered and historic
figure, if not semi-divine, and it's doubtless had an effect..."
Dave Simpson
2004-06-11 22:44:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dwain
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
Superficial, childish bullshit.

(Where is your condemnation of FDR for attacking Nazi Germany?)


Dave Simpson
Colonel Polyps
2004-06-11 23:43:42 UTC
Permalink
Nazi Germany attacked us.
Christian media police reports; "Yahoo One More Coonass Whacked"
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1086852388238530.xml

That's one less Hawaiian coonass pointing a gun at my head.

Death to the christian jew cop government
Post by Dave Simpson
Post by Dwain
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
Superficial, childish bullshit.
(Where is your condemnation of FDR for attacking Nazi Germany?)
Dave Simpson
Nobody
2004-06-12 20:47:12 UTC
Permalink
In <***@enews4.newsguy.com>, "Colonel Polyps"
<***@layeft.rot> wrote:

-Nazi Germany attacked us.

Yup. That unannounced attack on New York harbor was devastating.

What a historical maroon ...



----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Dwain
2004-06-12 13:54:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dave Simpson
Post by Dwain
Only a traitor to America would train and fund terrorists and try to
overthrow a democratically elected government.
Superficial, childish bullshit.
Oh wow, what a refutation! I am awed by the depth of Dave's superior
intellect and grasp of history!
Post by Dave Simpson
(Where is your condemnation of FDR for attacking Nazi Germany?)
Say what?
Dave Simpson
2004-06-11 18:10:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@merde.com
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Jasmine is part of the US-and-West hating shit of Western society.

All those who wail about the "secret, illegal war" and Iran-Contra
are in the most kind and generous assessment, merely silly and
superficial dupes. Too often instead they are traitorous scum, who
would rush to the side of the pro-Communist liberal Democrats in
Congress, if not excoriate those treasonous Democrats for not being
"firm" (treasonous) enough toward Reagan and the USA.


Dave Simpson
Dave Simpson
2004-06-11 18:11:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@merde.com
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
Jasmine is part of the US-and-West hating shit of Western society.

All those who wail about the "secret, illegal war" and Iran-Contra
are in the most kind and generous assessment, merely silly and
superficial dupes. Too often instead they are traitorous scum, who
would rush to the side of the pro-Communist liberal Democrats in
Congress, if not excoriate those treasonous Democrats for not being
"firm" (treasonous) enough toward Reagan and the USA.


Dave Simpson
Jasmine
2004-06-11 21:54:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Even the CIA admitted that the Soviet's power were waning by the early 80s'
..and were collapsing by their own weight. Please, do attempt to re-write
history The Sandinistas (though some were "Marxists") were NOT "communists"
(and had liberal policies similar to most developed countries form NZ to
Sweden), were democratically elected in the mid 80s' (in spite of the huge
effort to undermine these elections by Reagan goons such as Olly North who
made up stories about Russian Migs, etc.)

"...under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism..."
VietEraA6Ordie
2004-06-12 02:03:01 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:54:24 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Even the CIA admitted that the Soviet's power were waning by the early 80s'
..and were collapsing by their own weight. Please, do attempt to re-write
history The Sandinistas (though some were "Marxists") were NOT "communists"
(and had liberal policies similar to most developed countries form NZ to
Sweden), were democratically elected in the mid 80s' (in spite of the huge
effort to undermine these elections by Reagan goons such as Olly North who
made up stories about Russian Migs, etc.)
"...under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism..."
Leftists really hate that Ronnie kicked their ass and was the best
President of the last half of the 20th century. Sucks to be you.

HAHAHAHAHA


Reagan: Leader of the free world. Ended the Cold War. Millionaire.
Banged a ton of hot Hollywood starlets.

Yuo: Unemployed hippie who spends his days ranting on an anonymous
troll board and masturbating into a semen-encrusted tube sock.


--

Well, sure, the government lies, and newspapers lie,
but in a democracy they aren't the same lies
<Alexis A. Gilliland>
Jasmine
2004-06-12 02:29:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:54:24 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Even the CIA admitted that the Soviet's power were waning by the early 80s'
..and were collapsing by their own weight. Please, do attempt to re-write
history The Sandinistas (though some were "Marxists") were NOT "communists"
(and had liberal policies similar to most developed countries form NZ to
Sweden), were democratically elected in the mid 80s' (in spite of the huge
effort to undermine these elections by Reagan goons such as Olly North who
made up stories about Russian Migs, etc.)
"...under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism..."
Reagan: Leader of the free world. Ended the Cold War. Millionaire.
Banged a ton of hot Hollywood starlets.
Yuo: Unemployed hippie who spends hier days ranting on an anonymous
troll board and masturbating into a semen-encrusted tube sock.
Actually it is a reasonably safe bet that I make more than you do...sorry.
Stick to the post...and the facts, please
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
--
Well, sure, the government lies, and newspapers lie,
but in a democracy they aren't the same lies
<Alexis A. Gilliland>
RoyDMercer
2004-06-12 06:24:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
Leftists really hate that Ronnie kicked their ass and was the best
President of the last half of the 20th century. Sucks to be you.
HAHAHAHAHA
JFK's approval rating was head and shoulders above Reagan's.
Colonel Polyps
2004-06-12 11:03:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by VietEraA6Ordie
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:54:24 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Even the CIA admitted that the Soviet's power were waning by the early 80s'
..and were collapsing by their own weight. Please, do attempt to re-write
history The Sandinistas (though some were "Marxists") were NOT "communists"
(and had liberal policies similar to most developed countries form NZ to
Sweden), were democratically elected in the mid 80s' (in spite of the huge
effort to undermine these elections by Reagan goons such as Olly North who
made up stories about Russian Migs, etc.)
"...under Reagan, more than 100,000
people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the World
Court for acts of terrorism..."
Leftists really hate that Ronnie kicked their ass and was the best
President of the last half of the 20th century. Sucks to be you.
HAHAHAHAHA
Reagan: Leader of the free world. Ended the Cold War. Millionaire.
Banged a ton of hot Hollywood starlets.
Greedy tax sucking maggot. Assasinated anyone who was in his way.
Including the Kennedys.

Leader of the Evil Empire. John Hinkley was almost a hero.

Death to the christian jew cop government.
AUK Registrar
2004-06-13 00:05:25 UTC
Permalink
In <***@enews4.newsguy.com>, "Colonel Polyps"
<***@layeft.rot> wrote:

-
-"VietEraA6Ordie" <***@alltel.net> wrote in message
-news:***@4ax.com...
-> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:54:24 +1200, "Jasmine"
-> <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
->
-> >
-> ><***@merde.com> wrote in message
-> >news:***@4ax.com...
-> >> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
-> >> <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
-> >>
-> >> > Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
-> >> >murderous attacks on Central America,
-> >>
-> >> How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
-> >>
-> >> Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
-> >> the middle of the COLD WAR!!
-> >
-> >Even the CIA admitted that the Soviet's power were waning by the
-early 80s'
-> >..and were collapsing by their own weight. Please, do attempt to
-re-write
-> >history The Sandinistas (though some were "Marxists") were NOT
-"communists"
-> >(and had liberal policies similar to most developed countries form NZ
-to
-> >Sweden), were democratically elected in the mid 80s' (in spite of the
-huge
-> >effort to undermine these elections by Reagan goons such as Olly
-North who
-> >made up stories about Russian Migs, etc.)
-> >
-> >"...under Reagan, more than 100,000
-> >people were slaughtered in Central America, and the United States was
-> >distinguished as the only country ever to have been convicted by the
-World
-> >Court for acts of terrorism..."
-> >
->
->
-> Leftists really hate that Ronnie kicked their ass and was the best
-> President of the last half of the 20th century. Sucks to be you.
->
-> HAHAHAHAHA
->
->
-> Reagan: Leader of the free world. Ended the Cold War. Millionaire.
-> Banged a ton of hot Hollywood starlets.
-
-Greedy tax sucking maggot. Assasinated anyone who was in his way.
-Including the Kennedys.

So now you're claiming Reagan had the Kennedy brothers killed?

Whatever you're smoking, pass some this way. That has GOT to be some
righteous shit!

-Leader of the Evil Empire. John Hinkley was almost a hero.

No wonder you admire Hinkley. He's a lunatic too.

Lazarus Cain
2004-06-12 04:26:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@merde.com
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:48:25 +1200, "Jasmine"
Post by Jasmine
Above all, it was Reagan's secret, illegal and
murderous attacks on Central America,
How dare Reagan fight the Communists in Nicaragua!!!
Iran-Contra helped fund fighters battling a COMMUNIST government in
the middle of the COLD WAR!!
Only a traitor to America would not support fighting Communists in
America's backyard!!!
I'm beginning to like the communists better than the Republicans, and
I'm beginning to like Islamists better than right wing war mongering
Christians.

However I still prefer freedom of religion and fundamnetal
Christianity as taught by Christ in preference to Islam, but this form
of Christanity I prefer disciplines us t be peaceful and tolerant as
opposed to war mongering and right wing. ...so there is a difference
here in attitudes of those who claim to be Christain.
I still prefer freedom of belief and to be self directed than to live
in a totalitarian state. Communism does not have to be totalitarian,
and it is easy for Republicans to assume totalitarian attitude and to
create a totalitarian state, after all they were born to rule the rest
of us.....so there can also be a difference in attitude of those who
can claim to be communist.


An upcoming trial on the world may test to see how well we can share
limited resources.

Recently we have seen a massive display of military power and witness
how it fails to win converts.
I take another look at the weapon of truth and the pen as it cannot be
kept from the interent, and see how the good ideas are more powerful
than all of Bush's weapons.

Witness this, that the antichrist can be beaten by the God's truth,
and not by military force.

America shold realize that truth and integrity is mightier than the
sword, before it self destructs from depending on military prowess. A
true patriot would be concerned about his nation turning into a
miltitant state with totalitarian tendencies, and would fight his own
government to prevent this from happening.

The first demand is the sanctity of the temple of God and that it be
free from intrusive searches by US authorities. Render unto Caesar
things that are Caesar's, and unto God things that are God's.
Dave Simpson
2004-06-11 18:04:33 UTC
Permalink
The scum of the earth continue to hate Reagan, and distort everything
associated with him and the funeral, including mischaracterization of
the surprisingly-respectful liberal media.

The scum of the earth in the liberal media see another excuse to LIE:


Reagan porn

The "liberal media's" unprecedented 24/7 gushing over a controversial
and divisive president caps a quarter-century of fawning.


http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/06/11/media/index_np.html
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...